Gross McGinley LLP

Blog Disclaimer

Blog Disclaimer

This Blog is intended for educational and informational purposes and intended to only provide you with a general understanding of the law, not to provide any legal advice, including on the subject of the Blog. Laws that may pertain to this Blog will vary by jurisdiction, and the information on this blog may not apply to you. The content within this Blog is not intended, and should not be construed, in any way to be legal advice and thus you should not rely on any information provided in the Blog as legal advice. You should consult with appropriate legal counsel concerning any issues for which legal advice may be needed. Your review or use of the Blog and the content therein is not intended to create, and does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Please contact us if you have any questions about a Blog or would like more information, but, by contacting us, no attorney-client relationship is formed between you and Gross McGinley, LLP, including the Blog author. Do not send any confidential information to Gross McGinley, LLP or the authors of the Blog without first speaking to one of our lawyers and receiving our permission to provide confidential information. Unsolicited confidential information sent to us may not be subject to an attorney-client privilege and may not be treated as confidential. This Blog is not published for advertising or solicitation purposes. Gross McGinley, LLP disclaims all liability to all persons for any claim, loss, liability or any damages that may arise in connection with the Blog and any content or information contained in the Blog. Even though we strive to create our Blog content based on our current understanding of the law, we cannot and do not guarantee that the content and information in the Blog is current, accurate, or complete. Gross McGinley, LLP owns the copyright in the Blog, which is protected by federal and state laws, including copyright laws. The Blog cannot be altered or modified in any way. A copy of the Blog may be used and printed only for personal, educational, informational and noncommercial purposes. The Blog cannot be used for any other purpose without the express permission of Gross McGinley, LLP.

FoxNews Takes on Powerful New Foe – The Littlest Pet Shop

Written by: and on November 06, 2015 | Category: Blog | Tags:

FoxNews Anchor, Harris Faulkner, has sued Hasbro Inc., manufacturer of The Littlest Pet Shop toys, for misappropriation of her name and likeness and violation of her right-of-publicity.  Ms. Faulkner claims that the hamster toy named “Harris Faulkner,” pictured below, unlawfully uses her name and “distinctive persona” for financial gain; Hasbro’s defense relies heavily on the differences between the plaintiff and toy hamster, including the toy’s golden fur, cute little pink nose and white muzzle, and further relies on the fact that it is a two-inch tall plastic toy hamster and she is a full-grown human woman.








*Images from: Ms. Faulkner’s page on; Amazon

Right-of-publicity claims are appropriate when someone commercially exploits the identity of a well-known person or celebrity, without their consent.  This body of law recognizes that celebrities have value in their identities, which can translate to financial and other benefits via the promotion of products and services and other marketing avenues.  It is not necessary for the exact name or likeness to be used; if the violating party evokes or otherwise suggests or conveys the identity and persona of the celebrity, it is a violation of the right-of-publicity.

The famous example defining this right was White v. Samsung in 1992.  Samsung ran an ad depicting the future (ironically, the ad was for VCRs), wherein a robot-version of Vanna White was turning letters on a giant game board.  The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit held that, even though they didn’t use White’s name or even her likeness, they were very obviously evoking her persona, popularity and recognition for commercial gain.  (989 F.2d 1512 (1993)) See Robot Vanna White in article by about futuristic advertising.

The claim in Hamster Harris v. Human Harris was filed in federal court in Newark, NJ last August; unless dismissed before then, a hearing will be held in December.

Attorney Kimberly A. Spotts-Kimmel, a partner in the Business Services Group, counsels businesses that maintain an online presence in all legal aspects of internet law.  She also works with a wide range of clients, from small businesses and non-profits to large corporations, on intellectual property, advertising, and media law matters.

Attorney Nicole J. O’Hara, a member of the firm’s Business Services Group, has specific experience with intellectual property law.  She works with businesses large and small, advancing and managing patent portfolios, drafting patent applications, and resolving trademark, copyright, trade secret, and patent-related issues. She also negotiates contracts for the commercialization of intellectual property including licenses, confidentiality, material transfer, inter-institutional, service, and research contracts.

Next Previous
View All Attorneys
View All Practice Areas
View Blog