Gross McGinley LLP

Blog Disclaimer

Blog Disclaimer

This Blog is intended for educational and informational purposes and intended to only provide you with a general understanding of the law, not to provide any legal advice, including on the subject of the Blog. Laws that may pertain to this Blog will vary by jurisdiction, and the information on this blog may not apply to you. The content within this Blog is not intended, and should not be construed, in any way to be legal advice and thus you should not rely on any information provided in the Blog as legal advice. You should consult with appropriate legal counsel concerning any issues for which legal advice may be needed. Your review or use of the Blog and the content therein is not intended to create, and does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Please contact us if you have any questions about a Blog or would like more information, but, by contacting us, no attorney-client relationship is formed between you and Gross McGinley, LLP, including the Blog author. Do not send any confidential information to Gross McGinley, LLP or the authors of the Blog without first speaking to one of our lawyers and receiving our permission to provide confidential information. Unsolicited confidential information sent to us may not be subject to an attorney-client privilege and may not be treated as confidential. This Blog is not published for advertising or solicitation purposes. Gross McGinley, LLP disclaims all liability to all persons for any claim, loss, liability or any damages that may arise in connection with the Blog and any content or information contained in the Blog. Even though we strive to create our Blog content based on our current understanding of the law, we cannot and do not guarantee that the content and information in the Blog is current, accurate, or complete. Gross McGinley, LLP owns the copyright in the Blog, which is protected by federal and state laws, including copyright laws. The Blog cannot be altered or modified in any way. A copy of the Blog may be used and printed only for personal, educational, informational and noncommercial purposes. The Blog cannot be used for any other purpose without the express permission of Gross McGinley, LLP.

Governor Corbett Signs Amendments to Pennsylvania Mechanics’ Lien Law Effective September 2014

Written by: on August 08, 2014 | Category: Blog | Tags:

In 2006, the Pennsylvania legislature passed sweeping changes (known as Act 52) to the 1963 Mechanic Lien Law, including a section that subordinated mechanics lien claims to the lien of open ended construction mortgages, “the proceeds of which are to be used to pay all or part of completing erection, construction, alteration or repair of  the mortgaged premises secured by the open end mortgage.”

In 2012, the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the case of Commerce Bank v. Kessler interpreted the “all or part of “ language to mean that the mechanics lien would be subordinate only if all of the proceeds from the mortgage were used to pay the cost of completing erection, construction, alteration or repair of the mortgaged premises subject to the open -end mortgage.

In response to the Kessler decision, the legislature passed, and Governor Corbett signed into law, Act 117 that amends the Mechanics’ Lien Law.  Act 117 quantifies the amount of the loan proceeds secured by an open end mortgage to qualify the mortgage for superiority over mechanics lien claims. Specifically, mechanics’ liens by contractors and subcontractors are subordinate to open end mortgage liens where at least 60% of the proceeds of the open end mortgage loan are intended to pay or are used to pay all or part of the costs of construction. It also adds a broad definition of  the “costs of construction” Further, Act 117 provided that a subcontractor does not have a right to a lien regarding residential real property if i) the owner or tenant paid the contract price to the general contractor, ii) the property is intended to be used as a residence of the owner or tenant of the owner and iii) the residential property consists of not more than two (2) dwelling units. Also added was a provision that authorizes an owner to discharge a mechanics lien claim of a subcontractor upon proof that the full contract price was paid to the contractor or to reduce the amount of the mechanic’s lien claim to the unpaid amount of the contract price.

This new amendments take affect on September 7, 2014 and should  have a positive affect on construction financing secured by  open end mortgages and related title insurance.  Subcontractors should also be aware of this new law and its effects on the viability of mechanic’s lien claims where the contractor has been paid.

Attorney Thomas Capehart provides bank clients with legal counsel pertaining to bankruptcy, foreclosure, collections, and creditors’ rights matters.

Next Previous
View All Attorneys
View All Practice Areas
View Blog