Gross McGinley LLP

Blog Disclaimer

Blog Disclaimer

This Blog is intended for educational and informational purposes and intended to only provide you with a general understanding of the law, not to provide any legal advice, including on the subject of the Blog. Laws that may pertain to this Blog will vary by jurisdiction, and the information on this blog may not apply to you. The content within this Blog is not intended, and should not be construed, in any way to be legal advice and thus you should not rely on any information provided in the Blog as legal advice. You should consult with appropriate legal counsel concerning any issues for which legal advice may be needed. Your review or use of the Blog and the content therein is not intended to create, and does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Please contact us if you have any questions about a Blog or would like more information, but, by contacting us, no attorney-client relationship is formed between you and Gross McGinley, LLP, including the Blog author. Do not send any confidential information to Gross McGinley, LLP or the authors of the Blog without first speaking to one of our lawyers and receiving our permission to provide confidential information. Unsolicited confidential information sent to us may not be subject to an attorney-client privilege and may not be treated as confidential. This Blog is not published for advertising or solicitation purposes. Gross McGinley, LLP disclaims all liability to all persons for any claim, loss, liability or any damages that may arise in connection with the Blog and any content or information contained in the Blog. Even though we strive to create our Blog content based on our current understanding of the law, we cannot and do not guarantee that the content and information in the Blog is current, accurate, or complete. Gross McGinley, LLP owns the copyright in the Blog, which is protected by federal and state laws, including copyright laws. The Blog cannot be altered or modified in any way. A copy of the Blog may be used and printed only for personal, educational, informational and noncommercial purposes. The Blog cannot be used for any other purpose without the express permission of Gross McGinley, LLP.

Employee Injured During Commute? Workers’ Compensation May Apply

Written by: on February 23, 2017 | Category: Blog | Tags:

The Pennsylvania Workers Compensation Act (77 P.S. § 1, et. seq. as amended) generally does not cover workers injured while commuting to work or traveling home from work because it is generally viewed as outside the course of employment. This is otherwise known as the “coming and going rule”. However, there are four well-recognized exceptions to that general rule. Exceptions to the coming and going rule are in the following instances:

  1. An employee has no fixed place of work or is deemed a traveling employee.
  2. The employment contract specifically includes transportation to and from work.
  3. The employee is on special assignment for the employer.
  4. Special circumstances indicate that the employee is furthering the business of the employer.

A Pennsylvania property management company’s recent petition to the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board under the coming and going rule was denied as the employee was “on call” during the time of an auto accident that caused his injuries.

Workers’ benefits payable under these circumstances are fact-specific and vary depending on an employee’s particular employment terms and conditions. If you have questions about Pennsylvania’s workers’ compensation statute, do not hesitate to contact us to review your set of circumstances.

Gross McGinley’s Employment Law team provides counsel to businesses large in small. Attorney Thomas A. Capehart has specific knowledge in workers’ compensation matters.

Next Previous
View All Attorneys
View Blog