Gross McGinley LLP

gross-headerimg-2
Blog Disclaimer

Blog Disclaimer

This Blog is intended for educational and informational purposes and intended to only provide you with a general understanding of the law, not to provide any legal advice, including on the subject of the Blog. Laws that may pertain to this Blog will vary by jurisdiction, and the information on this blog may not apply to you. The content within this Blog is not intended, and should not be construed, in any way to be legal advice and thus you should not rely on any information provided in the Blog as legal advice. You should consult with appropriate legal counsel concerning any issues for which legal advice may be needed. Your review or use of the Blog and the content therein is not intended to create, and does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Please contact us if you have any questions about a Blog or would like more information, but, by contacting us, no attorney-client relationship is formed between you and Gross McGinley, LLP, including the Blog author. Do not send any confidential information to Gross McGinley, LLP or the authors of the Blog without first speaking to one of our lawyers and receiving our permission to provide confidential information. Unsolicited confidential information sent to us may not be subject to an attorney-client privilege and may not be treated as confidential. This Blog is not published for advertising or solicitation purposes. Gross McGinley, LLP disclaims all liability to all persons for any claim, loss, liability or any damages that may arise in connection with the Blog and any content or information contained in the Blog. Even though we strive to create our Blog content based on our current understanding of the law, we cannot and do not guarantee that the content and information in the Blog is current, accurate, or complete. Gross McGinley, LLP owns the copyright in the Blog, which is protected by federal and state laws, including copyright laws. The Blog cannot be altered or modified in any way. A copy of the Blog may be used and printed only for personal, educational, informational and noncommercial purposes. The Blog cannot be used for any other purpose without the express permission of Gross McGinley, LLP.

Marriage Equality and the Impact on Same Sex Couple Adoptions

Written by: on December 29, 2014 | Category: Blog | Tags: ,

On May 20, 2014, U.S. District Judge John E. Jones, III struck down Pennsylvania’s Defense of Marriage Act, and thus, for the very first time, same sex couples could marry in this Commonwealth and out-of-state marriages would be recognized.

With that sweeping change comes new opportunities and challenges for same sex couples. Consider adoption. There are many reasons to adopt a child. Among them are the important benefits that flow from the relationship of parent and child. For example, inheritance rights and rights to federal benefits like social security can only be secured through adoption if a “parent” dies without a will or becomes disabled. Or a “parent” could lose all custodial rights to the child if the biological parent dies or ends the relationship or marriage while the child is still a minor. Hospital visits to see a sick child may be difficult or impossible without an adoption.

Prior to the Whitewood decision, same sex couples in Pennsylvania could adopt but the process was time consuming, obviously more expensive as a result and, frankly, unfair. Under Pennsylvania’s Adoption Act, the parent of a child to be adopted must permanently relinquish all parental rights to the child. The exception, of course, involves a situation where the adopting parent is the spouse of the so-called consenting parent.

Prior to Whitewood, Pennsylvania did not permit same sex couples to marry and, adding insult to injury, would not recognize otherwise valid marriages from other states. So same sex couples had only two options. First, the “consenting” parent could go before the Court and relinquish all rights to the child. Once that voluntary termination of parental rights was accepted by the Court, the “consenting” parent could file for a joint adoption with his or her spouse.

Stop and think about that for a minute. Imagine giving up your child, no matter for how temporary a period of time, and even if only for purely tactical purposes. The second option involved finding a sympathetic judge and persuading the Court that the best interest of the child would be served by allowing the spouse to adopt without requiring the parent to give up his or her rights.

Now, with marriage equality, same sex couples no longer need to face that kind of uncertainty or unnecessary expense. The “spousal exception” is available and those additional expensive, time consuming and somewhat humiliating obstacles are relegated to the dust bin of history. Second, parent adoption is important, even if a same sex couple chooses to marry. As noted above, adoption provides legal protection and affords critical benefits to the child and family alike. A spouse who has health insurance and life insurance can now, through adoption, insure that that child is recognized as a dependent in order to be eligible for those benefits.


Attorney Tullar, Partner Attorney and Chair of the Matrimonial and Family Law Group at Gross McGinley, LLP, regularly counsels individuals in divorce, custody and child support matters. He has also guided families through adoption, guardianship, and domestic partnership matters. In 2002, Allen was appointed as a Master to the Lehigh County Family Court where he implemented the new Lehigh County three-tier domestic relations system. He served with the county for three years, during which time he held de novo support hearings and custody conferences and acted as a Master in Divorce.

Next Previous
View All Attorneys
View All Practice Areas
View Blog