Gross McGinley LLP

Blog Disclaimer

Blog Disclaimer

This Blog is intended for educational and informational purposes and intended to only provide you with a general understanding of the law, not to provide any legal advice, including on the subject of the Blog. Laws that may pertain to this Blog will vary by jurisdiction, and the information on this blog may not apply to you. The content within this Blog is not intended, and should not be construed, in any way to be legal advice and thus you should not rely on any information provided in the Blog as legal advice. You should consult with appropriate legal counsel concerning any issues for which legal advice may be needed. Your review or use of the Blog and the content therein is not intended to create, and does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Please contact us if you have any questions about a Blog or would like more information, but, by contacting us, no attorney-client relationship is formed between you and Gross McGinley, LLP, including the Blog author. Do not send any confidential information to Gross McGinley, LLP or the authors of the Blog without first speaking to one of our lawyers and receiving our permission to provide confidential information. Unsolicited confidential information sent to us may not be subject to an attorney-client privilege and may not be treated as confidential. This Blog is not published for advertising or solicitation purposes. Gross McGinley, LLP disclaims all liability to all persons for any claim, loss, liability or any damages that may arise in connection with the Blog and any content or information contained in the Blog. Even though we strive to create our Blog content based on our current understanding of the law, we cannot and do not guarantee that the content and information in the Blog is current, accurate, or complete. Gross McGinley, LLP owns the copyright in the Blog, which is protected by federal and state laws, including copyright laws. The Blog cannot be altered or modified in any way. A copy of the Blog may be used and printed only for personal, educational, informational and noncommercial purposes. The Blog cannot be used for any other purpose without the express permission of Gross McGinley, LLP.

Pennsylvania’s Right-to-Know Law

Written by: on November 21, 2016 | Category: Blog | Tags:

In February, 2008, then Governor Rendell signed the new Right-to-Know Law into effect, completely overhauling the prior 1957 Right-to-Know Act. The new law provides for access to, and copies of, any “public record”:  a record of a government agency’s “activity” which is created, received or retained pursuant to law or in connection with a transaction, business or activity of that agency.  By definition, records which are subject to thirty (30) statutory exemptions, are exempt from disclosure pursuant to law, regulation or judicial order, or are protected by a privilege (doctor – patient, attorney – client, etc.) are not “public records”.

Each governmental agency designates an Open Records Officer to process and respond to Right-to-Know requests. If the agency has a website, it must identify that officer on the website.  Although the State provides a general request form, which must be honored, an agency may create its own.  If so, it must be available on its website.

Requests must be specific; so to allow an agency to understand what record is being requested. Thus, a request must be limited in time (number of months or years), scope (such as authors or recipients of e-mails), and subject matter.

An agency must respond, in writing, within five (5) business days of receiving a request. An agency may invoke an extension of time up to 30 days to respond; but must do so in writing within those first five (5) days, giving both the reason(s) that it cannot respond within five (5) days as well as its estimated response date. An agency must then allow access to or give reasons for denying access to the record.

An agency may charge a reasonable cost (limited by the State Office Of Open Records) for making copies. An agency may produce records in various formats (paper, electronic, etc.); but is not required to create a record which does not exist (such as compiling data for comparison), or in a format in which it does not exist.

A requestor may appeal an agency’s denial of a request to the State Office Of Open Records. Attorneys in municipal litigation are using the Right-to-Know more and more frequently as an alternative to, or to supplant formal Discovery. These topics, however, are the subjects of future writings.

Chris Gittinger is a member of Gross McGinley’s Insurance Defense and Municipal Practice Groups. He regularly represents municipal agencies and authorities in legal matters pertaining to litigation, real estate, zoning, and more.

Next Previous
View All Attorneys
View All Practice Areas
View Blog