Gross McGinley LLP

Blog Disclaimer

Blog Disclaimer

This Blog is intended for educational and informational purposes and intended to only provide you with a general understanding of the law, not to provide any legal advice, including on the subject of the Blog. Laws that may pertain to this Blog will vary by jurisdiction, and the information on this blog may not apply to you. The content within this Blog is not intended, and should not be construed, in any way to be legal advice and thus you should not rely on any information provided in the Blog as legal advice. You should consult with appropriate legal counsel concerning any issues for which legal advice may be needed. Your review or use of the Blog and the content therein is not intended to create, and does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Please contact us if you have any questions about a Blog or would like more information, but, by contacting us, no attorney-client relationship is formed between you and Gross McGinley, LLP, including the Blog author. Do not send any confidential information to Gross McGinley, LLP or the authors of the Blog without first speaking to one of our lawyers and receiving our permission to provide confidential information. Unsolicited confidential information sent to us may not be subject to an attorney-client privilege and may not be treated as confidential. This Blog is not published for advertising or solicitation purposes. Gross McGinley, LLP disclaims all liability to all persons for any claim, loss, liability or any damages that may arise in connection with the Blog and any content or information contained in the Blog. Even though we strive to create our Blog content based on our current understanding of the law, we cannot and do not guarantee that the content and information in the Blog is current, accurate, or complete. Gross McGinley, LLP owns the copyright in the Blog, which is protected by federal and state laws, including copyright laws. The Blog cannot be altered or modified in any way. A copy of the Blog may be used and printed only for personal, educational, informational and noncommercial purposes. The Blog cannot be used for any other purpose without the express permission of Gross McGinley, LLP.

Sellers Now Required to Collect Sales Tax Based on Customer Location

Written by: on May 20, 2019 | Category: Blog | Tags: ,

Do you sell merchandise or services by mail or online? If so, you may be required to collect sales tax imposed at the customer’s location.

Traditionally sellers were required to collect a state’s sales tax only if the seller had a physical presence in the customer’s state (a store, office, warehouse, etc.). That all changed when the US Supreme Court in 2018 decided a case South Dakota v. Wayfair. The Supreme Court decision approved a state law that required sellers to collect the sales tax charged by the customer’s state if the seller had a substantial economic connection to the customer’s state (even if it had no physical presence in that state).

Each state that has a sales tax is starting to establish rules defining the sales tax collection responsibilities of out of state businesses that sell to customers in that state. For example, Pennsylvania has adopted a rule, effective July 1, 2019, that if a non-Pennsylvania business has $100,000 of sales to Pennsylvania customers within the last 12 months, that seller must collect Pennsylvania sales tax on the sales to Pennsylvania customers.

There are sales taxes in 45 states (Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire and Oregon don’t have a sales tax) and in many states there are city or county sales taxes in addition to the state sales tax. Sales taxes also vary place to place in defining what products or services are subject to sales tax. As those different states and localities start enforcing sales taxes on sales to their residents, a seller has a challenge understanding many different rules in different places. Fortunately, there are software programs and services that can help determine whether the sale of a particular product or service is subject to sales tax in a particular place, and states are expected to be lenient if the seller relies on software or a service like that. For example, the July 1, 2019 Pennsylvania rule says that a seller relied on a Pennsylvania-approved software or service vendor to determine whether the sale of a particular product or service is subject to sales tax in Pennsylvania, the seller is not liable on a sales tax audit by the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue.

If you have questions about your responsibility to collect Pennsylvania sales tax on sales to Pennsylvania customers, contact us today to speak with an experienced business and tax attorney who can help answer your questions.

Next Previous
View All Attorneys
View All Practice Areas
View Blog