Gross McGinley LLP

Blog Disclaimer

Blog Disclaimer

This Blog is intended for educational and informational purposes and intended to only provide you with a general understanding of the law, not to provide any legal advice, including on the subject of the Blog. Laws that may pertain to this Blog will vary by jurisdiction, and the information on this blog may not apply to you. The content within this Blog is not intended, and should not be construed, in any way to be legal advice and thus you should not rely on any information provided in the Blog as legal advice. You should consult with appropriate legal counsel concerning any issues for which legal advice may be needed. Your review or use of the Blog and the content therein is not intended to create, and does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Please contact us if you have any questions about a Blog or would like more information, but, by contacting us, no attorney-client relationship is formed between you and Gross McGinley, LLP, including the Blog author. Do not send any confidential information to Gross McGinley, LLP or the authors of the Blog without first speaking to one of our lawyers and receiving our permission to provide confidential information. Unsolicited confidential information sent to us may not be subject to an attorney-client privilege and may not be treated as confidential. This Blog is not published for advertising or solicitation purposes. Gross McGinley, LLP disclaims all liability to all persons for any claim, loss, liability or any damages that may arise in connection with the Blog and any content or information contained in the Blog. Even though we strive to create our Blog content based on our current understanding of the law, we cannot and do not guarantee that the content and information in the Blog is current, accurate, or complete. Gross McGinley, LLP owns the copyright in the Blog, which is protected by federal and state laws, including copyright laws. The Blog cannot be altered or modified in any way. A copy of the Blog may be used and printed only for personal, educational, informational and noncommercial purposes. The Blog cannot be used for any other purpose without the express permission of Gross McGinley, LLP.

Year-End Municipal Update

Written by: on December 16, 2018 | Category: Blog | Tags:

The new year brings with it new laws impacting municipal entities in 2019.

Public Bidding Thresholds

Prior to 2012, the thresholds for which public bidding was required had not been adjusted for quite some time. Bids of some sort (whether formal or telephonic) were needed for all purchases in excess of $4,000.00. Act 90 of 2011 raised that amount to $10,000.00 as of January 1, 2012 and provided for annual increases based on the Consumer Price Index. The Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry has released public bidding thresholds for municipalities and authorities effective January 1, 2019. Those thresholds are:

  • Purchases and contracts below $11,100 require no formal bidding or quotations.
  • Purchases and contracts between $11,100 and $20,600 require three quotations, which may be written or telephonic.
  • Purchases and contracts over $20,600 require formal bidding.
  • This reflects a 2.3% increase from the 2018 public bidding thresholds.

Sunshine Act Amendment

In October, Governor Tom Wolf signed Act 156 into law. Act 156 amends the Sunshine Act to allow a public agency to hold an executive session to discuss emergency preparedness and public safety matters that, if discussed in public, would be reasonably likely to jeopardize or threaten public safety or public protection.

In other municipal news, a number of bills that have been closely watched have died as the 2017-2018 legislative session came to an end without action. Notably, House Bill 1531, which would have revamped the Sunshine Act to require stricter notice requirements for public agency business has fizzled. Likewise, House Bill 2564, which aimed to impose strict timelines and fee limits on applications for small cell wireless facilities and proposed limitations on local governments with respect to the regulations of such facilities in public rights of way has also died. However, the Wireless Infrastructure Order, which addresses similar matters relating to small cell wireless facilities on a federal level, was adopted by the Federal Communications Commission in September and remains in play, pending appeal by several cities across the country.

Attorney Sarah Murray is a real estate and municipal lawyer, serving as Solicitor to municipalities large and small in the Lehigh Valley region.

Next Previous
View All Attorneys
View All Practice Areas
View Blog