Gross McGinley LLP

Blog Disclaimer

Blog Disclaimer

This Blog is intended for educational and informational purposes and intended to only provide you with a general understanding of the law, not to provide any legal advice, including on the subject of the Blog. Laws that may pertain to this Blog will vary by jurisdiction, and the information on this blog may not apply to you. The content within this Blog is not intended, and should not be construed, in any way to be legal advice and thus you should not rely on any information provided in the Blog as legal advice. You should consult with appropriate legal counsel concerning any issues for which legal advice may be needed. Your review or use of the Blog and the content therein is not intended to create, and does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Please contact us if you have any questions about a Blog or would like more information, but, by contacting us, no attorney-client relationship is formed between you and Gross McGinley, LLP, including the Blog author. Do not send any confidential information to Gross McGinley, LLP or the authors of the Blog without first speaking to one of our lawyers and receiving our permission to provide confidential information. Unsolicited confidential information sent to us may not be subject to an attorney-client privilege and may not be treated as confidential. This Blog is not published for advertising or solicitation purposes. Gross McGinley, LLP disclaims all liability to all persons for any claim, loss, liability or any damages that may arise in connection with the Blog and any content or information contained in the Blog. Even though we strive to create our Blog content based on our current understanding of the law, we cannot and do not guarantee that the content and information in the Blog is current, accurate, or complete. Gross McGinley, LLP owns the copyright in the Blog, which is protected by federal and state laws, including copyright laws. The Blog cannot be altered or modified in any way. A copy of the Blog may be used and printed only for personal, educational, informational and noncommercial purposes. The Blog cannot be used for any other purpose without the express permission of Gross McGinley, LLP.

Judicial Privilege Does Not Shield Attorneys from Civil Liability in Dragonetti Act Claims

Written by: Graig M. Schultz on March 03, 2017 | Category: Blog | Tags:

The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently ruled that the doctrine of judicial privilege does not afford attorneys protection from Dragonetti Act claims (a law which allows defendants to sue attorneys if they feel they were targeted, frivolously).

In the case of Freundlich & Littman, LLC v. Feierstein, the plaintiffs brought a claim against the defendant attorneys and their law firm — under Pennsylvania’s Dragonetti Act — for wrongful use of civil proceedings.  The plaintiffs argued that a counterclaim filed by the defendants — on behalf of their client  in an underlying action — was meritless and procedurally improper.  In response, the defendants argued that they were immune from Dragonetti Act claims pursuant to the doctrine of judicial privilege, which provides that attorneys are entitled to absolute immunity for actions taken in the course of representing a client in a judicial proceeding.  The trial court agreed with the defendants, and dismissed all claims for wrongful use of civil proceedings and abuse of process.

On appeal, the Superior Court disagreed with the trial court, pointing out that no other court has ever held that judicial privilege bars litigation of claims arising under the Dragonetti Act. The Superior Court also noted that “courts throughout this Commonwealth have recognized that parties should be held liable for bringing improper actions and exploiting the legal process” and that “adequate safeguards exist to ensure that a bona fide litigant is not penalized for pursing an action or defending itself.”


Attorney Graig M. Schultz is a member of Gross McGinley’s Litigation Group, representing businesses and individuals before state and federal courts as well as judicial boards.

Next Previous
View All Attorneys
View All Practice Areas
View Blog