Gross McGinley LLP

Blog Disclaimer

Blog Disclaimer

This Blog is intended for educational and informational purposes and intended to only provide you with a general understanding of the law, not to provide any legal advice, including on the subject of the Blog. Laws that may pertain to this Blog will vary by jurisdiction, and the information on this blog may not apply to you. The content within this Blog is not intended, and should not be construed, in any way to be legal advice and thus you should not rely on any information provided in the Blog as legal advice. You should consult with appropriate legal counsel concerning any issues for which legal advice may be needed. Your review or use of the Blog and the content therein is not intended to create, and does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Please contact us if you have any questions about a Blog or would like more information, but, by contacting us, no attorney-client relationship is formed between you and Gross McGinley, LLP, including the Blog author. Do not send any confidential information to Gross McGinley, LLP or the authors of the Blog without first speaking to one of our lawyers and receiving our permission to provide confidential information. Unsolicited confidential information sent to us may not be subject to an attorney-client privilege and may not be treated as confidential. This Blog is not published for advertising or solicitation purposes. Gross McGinley, LLP disclaims all liability to all persons for any claim, loss, liability or any damages that may arise in connection with the Blog and any content or information contained in the Blog. Even though we strive to create our Blog content based on our current understanding of the law, we cannot and do not guarantee that the content and information in the Blog is current, accurate, or complete. Gross McGinley, LLP owns the copyright in the Blog, which is protected by federal and state laws, including copyright laws. The Blog cannot be altered or modified in any way. A copy of the Blog may be used and printed only for personal, educational, informational and noncommercial purposes. The Blog cannot be used for any other purpose without the express permission of Gross McGinley, LLP.

Prenuptial Agreement Enforcement

Written by: on March 13, 2018 | Category: Blog | Tags:

When contemplating marriage, there is nothing more romantic than a prenuptial agreement, right? While discussing a prenuptial agreement with your potential spouse may not be the most comfortable topic of conversation, it certainly is an important one.

Both parties to a prenuptial agreement should be exceedingly careful when entering into an agreement. The language that is crafted at the time of execution will be specifically enforced if a divorce is filed. Accordingly, all the heavy lifting with regard to the agreement is done while the couple is likely quite happy and not anticipating any of the problems that may arise.

A prenuptial agreement is usually only tested if a couple is considering divorce. Until that time, it is likely that neither party has revisited the document. There could easily be decades between when the prenuptial agreement was crafted, and when it will be enforced.

While Pennsylvania law does not focus on what must be included in a prenuptial agreement, it does set out what you must show if you want the Court to declare the agreement is not enforceable. The Court will always start from the assumption that the prenuptial agreement is valid and enforceable. As such, the spouse who is unhappy with the terms and wishes to discard the agreement has the burden to show, by clear and convincing evidence, that the agreement should not be enforceable.

If you wish to argue that a prenuptial agreement should not be enforced, you have limited options. You must show either that the agreement was not entered into voluntarily or that one party did not provide “fair and reasonable disclosure of property or financial obligations.” For example, if a party is unaware of an offshore bank account because that fact was not disclosed when drafting the prenuptial agreement, you may argue that the agreement should not be enforced due to fraud or misrepresentation.

It is worthy to note that terms of a prenuptial agreement are not required to be fair. The Courts will allow parties to enter into bad deals. In fact, Courts have found that parties are bound by the agreement, even if it was not read or fully understood. The duty to read the agreement or seek legal counsel before signing is the responsibility of each party. If a party blindly enters into a prenuptial agreement with the romantic notation that their prospective spouse would have their best interests at heart, they will be bound by that agreement unless one of the limited exceptions applies.

Attorney Kellie Rahl-Heffner is a family law attorney, providing legal guidance in the areas of divorce, prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, child custody, alimony, and more. 

Next Previous
View All Attorneys
View All Practice Areas
View Blog